The strenuous process of writing the PhD thesis had started as early as February 1981 and the guides had gone through it once before I took my family home. After return from Kozhikode, second round corrections were completed and the matter was ready to be typed. Most of my typing work for research papers was being done by a stenographer, Mr.Padmanabhan Nambiar, of Indian Society for Technical Education(ISTE) which had its office in I.I.T Delhi administrative building. He was deputed from Tamil Nadu state service and was the trusted assistant of I.S.T.E. Programme Coordinator Prof.Hegde. He was dedicated to his profession fully and it was difficult to find such a committed typist like him.
Remember , it was in 1981. Minimum five copies of the thesis had to be submitted to the
institute. Two copies for me and one copy for Oil and Natural Gas Commission
(ONGC) for whom I had
taken up the project made the number of copies required to be 8.
Computer typing and photocopying facilities were not available at that time.
Multiple copies could be made on typewriters using carbon paper but the carbon
copies were not acceptable by the institute. The other alternative to get 8
identical copies of the thesis was to cyclostyle the matter. The process of
cyclostyling is first to type the matter on a special type of paper called
stencil paper. As the letters on the typewriters hit on this paper, tiny holes
are created on the soft tissue-type paper. When this stencil is kept on the
cyclostyling machine with dark ink, ink will slowly penetrate the hole and an
impression will be created on an ordinary white paper. Ordinary cyclostyling
paper is a bit thick, quickly moisture absorbing type. Printing can also be
done carefully on A4 size bond paper.
The stencil papers were expensive,
costing five to six rupees per sheet A stencil, once cut, cannot
be corrected or used again as the perforations made by the striking letters
remain permanent. Therefore, utmost care is to be taken in typing on stencils and things cannot be done in a
hurried manner. If mistakes are there,
the stencil has to be thrown away as it cannot be corrected. As Nambiar was a
very good professional at his typing work, it was certain that mistakes will be
very much less. Further, he being a perfectionist, he used to go to his friend
Bhatia in mechanical department (who has
a typewriting machine with Greek characters) to insert
Greek letters like µ, α , β, φ ,θ ,Σ ,ξ in my thesis. This will be
usually done during the lunch recess. Most of the other typists will ask these letters to be inserted by hand
with a hard-metallic stylus pen, but hand-written Greek letters will not
appear to be uniform. Nambiar was so
careful to put a carat (^ ) sign by reinserting the stencil and typing ‘v’ in the appropriate place. To avoid
confusion between number 1 and
letter l , he used to type a ( , go back by a space and type ‘/’ to form
the special letter l and he used to instruct me to close
the open
space at the top of the letter by
hand. PhD thesis being the report of
the hard work done over a period of three or more years, it was absolutely
necessary that no mistakes creep in the thesis. A perfect work is what is
desired, not like some
of the PhD thesis in the News in
Kerala where even names of authors
of famous books are written erroneously.
Nambiar was
obviously a perfectionist by nature and
it was my pleasure to get the work done by him. He has some peculiarities
though. Someone has to read the matter
to him sitting by his side. He will keep on typing continuously, occasionally
taking a sip of some liquid he used to keep below his table. Thus, the thesis running to almost
350 pages was typed completely by end of
June. The figures were also drawn and combining all these 8 copies of the PhD
thesis were ready soon after. Three copies to the academic
section and two copies to the two guides, one copy to ONGC and two for me together
added up to eight. Initially, the copies are
to be submitted in soft bound form. After evaluation by the examiners and open defence
in the department, final copy is to be submitted incorporating corrections, if
any, in hard copy (calico or clothe-bound). Copy of the thesis will be kept in
the library only after successful defence.
Copies of the synopsis of the thesis submitted earlier are sent
to a panel of examiners, one from within India and another abroad. Based
on their expertise and research back ground, if they accept the appointment,
copy of the thesis is sent to them. Examiners chosen are eminent researchers
who have worked in the area of research for several years. Usually a period of
3 months is given for examiners, but if any one of the examiners delay the
report, thesis defence and award of degree will be delayed. If both the
examiners give a positive recommendation for the award of the degree, an open
defence is conducted with the Indian examiner present. Any clarifications or
questions posed by the foreign examiner is also sought and queries from others
in the audience also have to be answered before the thesis is formally
accepted. I submitted the thesis by end of July, cleared the dues in the
Nalanda hostel, library etc and bid farewell to my teachers and friends and
returned to my institution and continued my teaching work in early Aug 1981.
From my
experience as Dean Post
Graduate Studies and
Research in N I T
Calicut, I would like to share my observation. In NIT
too, we were having a similar procedure, two examiners , one from India and
another from abroad. Usually examiners
from abroad will accept the examinership only of the topic of the research is close to their expertise and current
area of research. These examiners are
usually offered a remuneration of ,say,
USD 100 or
so and one or two examiners had
written to me
that they are not interested in receiving
this honorarium and this amount could be donated to some
poor students aid fund. But we
had to force him to receive the amount as we could not properly account for such donations. However, at
least a few examiners from our country
would readily accept the examinership irrespective of the area of
research, probably expecting the reasonably good honorarium they would get but would
take inordinately long time to
evaluate the thesis and send a report.
If the topic of research is not familiar
to the examiner, it will be difficult to give a proper assessment. In fact, I had to
deal with a VIP examiner from our own state who took
more than an year to send the report and the lady researcher who submitted the thesis was badly looking for a job after delivery of her first child. When he was repeatedly dodging, with
reluctant permission of the Director I
had to cancel the appointment and appoint another
examiner to evaluate the thesis. This examiner was kind enough to send the report in two months so
that the lady could get
her viva voce completed soon
after and join the job. In short,
academic integrity is sometimes
lacking in some of these
individuals. These persons tarnish the
image of the institution and create hardships for the research scholars.
Comments
Post a Comment